Lauren Hutton Attacks "Sex And The City, Clay Gets A Woman Pregnant
Lauren Hutton Attacks "Sex and the City"
Who knew Lauren Hutton was such a nutty ol' cougar?
The 64-year-old gap-toothed model/actress delivered a bizarre rant against Sex and the City during an appearance on the Today show yesterday.
It all started after Kathie Lee Gifford asked the worldwide do-gooder, who was discussing her charity work, if she thought the Sex and the City movie promoted materialism.
Confessing that she had never seen the show, Hutton still dared to claim that Sex and the City's slutty gay writers portrayed women as promiscuous.
Okay, there is no denying that Samantha slept with, well, anything that moved. But Carrie, Miranda and Charlotte?
"It's written by guys who happen to be gay and who are sluts. That's what I think," Hutton insisted.
She also said: "You have a bunch of guys who are sluts writing for women and telling them they are supposed to act like this."
Hutton went on to declare that most men are sluts and explained that men want to spread their genes, pantomiming her thoughts via a sort of machine gun action that was apparently supposed to represent slutty guys spreading their seed.
You could tell that poor Kathie Lee, hardly the beacon of sanity, couldn't believe what she was hearing not to mention seeing.
Co-host Hoda Kotb finally interrupted Hutton's wacky diatribe and switched the subject to her makeup line, which is what Hutton was there to promote in the first place.
I have to ask: What do all of you sluts out there think of what Hutton had to say? Watch the clip below.
Clay Aiken Gets Someone Pregnant
Nothing says "I'm gay" like getting a friend pregnant through the magic of artificial insemination, but Clay Aiken, who refuses to discuss his sexual orientation, has gone ahead and done it.
Yes, Aiken is going to be a baby daddy. The news comes courtesy of TMZ.com.
The mother-to-be is Jaymes Foster, a 50-year-old divorcée who executive produced Aiken's latest album and happens to be the sister of music mogul David Foster.
Aiken and his baby mama actually live together in Los Angeles, and according to TMZ.com, the 29-year-old American Idol runner-up will have an active role in raising the little Aiken.
I wish more than anything that I was friends with Kathy Griffin so I could call her right now.
"Hello, Kathy! It's me! Carter! You're never gonna believe this! The Gaiken is having a baby!!!!!!!"
I know Griffin would have something deliciously snarky to say about the Gaiken adding to the Claynation.
I bet you do, too. So what do you think about the news that Aiken is having a baby?
Who needs queer bashhers when you are around! The tone of that story is so harsh and vile! I feel sorry for you.
Posted by: Harley_Daddy | May 30, 2008 at 12:33 PM
If he wants to live a lie, just LET HIM!!
Posted by: Anthony | May 30, 2008 at 12:44 PM
Hey if he wants to be a dad all the power to him. I am gay and had two children the natural way before I came out of the closet and now I can't see them. The mothers and the way people think about gays got my rights taken away. Now that they are older the love me for who I am it's sad. Let the guy be a dad as long as he's in the picture stop bashing him.
Posted by: john | May 30, 2008 at 01:20 PM
EVEN THOUGH PEOPLE ARE GAY BORN OR WHETHER THEY GO THRU THEIR OWN JOURNEY OF DISCOVERY SOME MEN STILL FEEL URGE TO HAVE BABIES,ITS ONLY THE STIGMA OF SOOCIETY THAT MAKES IT DIFFICULT. THIS WORLD ISNT RUN BY GAY PEOPLE AND JUST LOOK AT THE MESS IT IS. MORE POWER TO CLAY, WHO CARES WHAT PEOPLE THINK NOBODY PAYS HIS BILLS,,HE DOES. AMERICA SHOULD CONCENTRATE ON HUNGER AND HOMELESSNESS STOP LOOKIN AT CELEB, THEY WOULD BE NOTHIN WITH US NOTHIN!
Posted by: DANIEL JURADO | May 30, 2008 at 04:30 PM
Hutton's comments make perfect sense from an evolutionary perspective. She was just less-than-articulate with the delivery.
Posted by: Steve | May 30, 2008 at 05:19 PM
its just rants of an older(or elderly?(lauren bacall) and she was a beautiful woman with a sexy voice, but.... ,we all go to there in our lives) it dont matter if its a men and women or women and women , men and men, sex is sex, and on the point of clay aiken, let him live his life, if he wants to deny who he is, let him, and if he likes women, lol, that is his perogative, and his life, im tired of the drama, and let get on with our own lives :-)
Posted by: simone | May 30, 2008 at 07:05 PM
"Hutton's comments make perfect sense from an evolutionary perspective. She was just less-than-articulate with the delivery." (steve)
Steve, if you think what she said makes perfect sense, then I want you to spread your seeds into my prosthetic vagina. I want to have your child.
But wait. I am a slut right? Dang, I'm gonna have to call Maury Pauvich about the DNA test. You da daddy, biotch.
Posted by: HP | June 01, 2008 at 10:40 PM
Carter: what a sad, sorry example of the human species you must be to take such delight in slamming others. Are you really so pathetic and insecure that you have to get your jollies by bashing people? The rant on Clay Aiken was embarrassing and totally inappropriate. Or do we gays not get enough disrespect in our lives already, so we have to spread a little venom around within our own community? It is no business of yours whether he is fathering a child (by artificial insemination or just plain old hetero sex!), and it is equally irrelevant whether he is gay. Let me paraphrase your first sentence to make it relevant to the person you see in the mirror every morning: Nothing says "I'm a bitchy, pathetic, self-loathing queen" like tearing someone else down just because you can.
Posted by: WM | June 02, 2008 at 12:54 AM
Lauren Hutton's remarks were spot on, aside from the fact that she chose to use the term "sluts", which was slightly inflammatory. I'm sure that the fellas here who took offense are promiscuous. Reacting defensively suggests that you aren't so sure of the appropriateness of your actions. If you are promiscuous, embrace it! There's nothing wrong with being a "slut" if you're safe and happy. As an aside, Gifford's expression in response to the word "sperm" being used in her presence was priceless.
Clay Aiken is having a kid? And this is posted on Gay.com? Who cares! I'll never understand gays who insist on giving the spotlight to those who can't be honest about their sexuality...or worse, make excuses for them. It's insulting. When Clay takes the ultimate plunge i'll consider feigning interest in his personal life.
Posted by: Kirk | June 02, 2008 at 02:01 AM
Actually, KIRK, I think what people find offensive about Lauren Hutton's verbal hot flash is the fact that she TWICE mentions she has NEVER SEEN the show SATC yet still feels qualified to [a] comment on it as part of a wholly ignorant and inaccurate rant and [b] presume to know that the series is written by "gay men who are sluts." In actuality, the series is written by both a gay man (Darren Starr) and a woman (Candace Bushnell). They share writing credit on all 94 episodes of the series. I do not know if either of them are sluts. Of the remaining nine writers receiving credit over the course of the series, 2 are men and 7 are women. Again, I don't know if any of them are sluts. What I might suggest, KIRK, is that you first look up the meaning of "spot on" before using it in public. Once you get that out of the way, you can come down of your moral high horse. While some people might be defensive because they are unsure of the "appropriateness of their actions," I'm pretty confident most people are defensive about Ms. Hutton's comments because, like your thoughts here, they are baseless, barely lucid and just left of pathetic.
Posted by: Ron H. | June 02, 2008 at 06:09 AM
This comment is to HP. It is so funny how outraged you are by an entertainment blog! You are the biggest hypocrite on here. You call the writer a "sad sorry example of the human species" because you are offended by what he is paid to do which is write about "entertainment." You really shouldn't take it so damn seriously. Geez, if you're so offended, don't read "entertainment" blogs. Read a book. Go for a walk. Let off some steam working on your bubble butt. Why are you ripping someone apart for doing their job? Ligthen up, HP.
Posted by: kb | June 02, 2008 at 08:35 AM
Ron H., I read the article again, as well as the comments, and I see nothing to bolster your assumption that people are angry because she hasn't seen the show. Sex and The City (a show that I love) has a very distinct reputation, which isn't far from the truth.
Ahh yes, my "moral high horse". I believe that's the typical retort used by those who percieve others as condemning them for things they may feel shame for in the first place. Re-read my statement, and pay closer attention. I didn't condemn anyone for anything, in fact i'd say I did just the opposite.
"Spot on", ok Ron, enlighten me, where exactly would you go to "look that up"? I'm assuming you've done it.
Don't get defensive, no one is insulting you or questioning your actions. People are inclined to make observations, and occasionally generalizations which might offend you...but they shouldn't.
Posted by: Kirk | June 02, 2008 at 02:01 PM
This comment is to kb: what? what drug are you taking? Did I say those things you're accusing me of? I think you're mistaken me for WM. Maybe you need to get a pair of bifocals. Or else, I'll sue you for slanders.
Posted by: HP | June 03, 2008 at 03:56 AM
This comment is to HP. Sorry! I made an innocent mistake. I'm not on drugs. Maybe I do need to get bifocals. I'll have to make an appointment with an optometrist.
Posted by: kb | June 03, 2008 at 08:38 PM
HP, I want to apologize. I didn't realize you aren't a fan of the theory of evolution. Perhaps you're an Evangelical Christian? Makes more sense. I'm eager to hear, then, why God made men so crazy horny, and women a little less so (oh I know I'm generalizing, but just for kicks, let's pretend it's true). I'm sure he had very, very good reasons.
Posted by: Steve | June 08, 2008 at 02:50 PM